How Victoria’s failed $6b pitch to Canberra put a new rail line in limbo

Melbourne’s west and north face worsening congestion and a growing volume of freight trucks on freeways after the Commonwealth baulked at Victoria’s multibillion-dollar plea to extend the city’s Inland Rail project.

No, this is happening because of the failed and yet to be delivered Port Rail Shuttles 8 years behind schedule. This is terrible journalism.

Confidential government documents seen by The Age reveal the state government put its hand out for up to $6 billion in federal government funding to kickstart work on the Outer Metropolitan Ring, one of the biggest transport projects in Victoria’s history.

You mean the CFMEU is asking for yet another project, sorry handout, as West Gate Tunnel is finishing.

An artist’s image of the proposed Beveridge terminal, which would handle goods moved on the Inland Rail.

Victoria sought billions for what it said was an urgently needed rail line between Melbourne’s outer north and west. The Age revealed this week that the government has already spent $350 million compensating landowners along the corridor despite there being no formal commitment to the route.

Really? The current lines are idle most of the day what is the problem we are trying to solve?

The new train line planned to accompany the major road project would give freight trains exclusive use of a 73-kilometre link between Werribee and Beveridge. It would also save industry from having to compete with Metro and V/Line trains for access to Melbourne’s constrained rail network.

Again another misguided statement, there is a freight only network available and it is not busy. This is an attempt by the road freight lobby to get funding for yet another road but by using the idea of rail to mask the true intentions.

Under the proposal, which was pitched to the former Morrison government in 2021, trains would travel down the median of the Outer Metropolitan Ring road, a little-known mega-project for Melbourne that has been planned since 2010. Planners expect the ring will be built in three stages over more than 20 years.

The Victorian government argued in confidential correspondence to the Coalition that the freight rail corridor was crucial to efforts to reduce container truck traffic on Melbourne’s busiest freeways. It costed the rail line at between $5.3 billion and $6 billion in 2021.

How will the proposed OMR help that? No this is a request for another truck sewer when removing trucks of the roads was to be the domain of the Port Rail Shuttles.

The case for the Outer Metropolitan Ring (OMR) was bolstered by traffic modelling from Infrastructure Victoria, which found that without it, sections of CityLink, the M80 Ring Road and the West Gate, Western and Calder freeways would be overloaded by 2051, causing heavy congestion. The M80 Ring Road is expected to carry an extra 1800 trucks in the morning peak alone by then.

I see, we are going to try and build our way out of congestion are we LOL.

This scenario would hurt Victoria’s economic productivity and push up the cost of goods, the technical analysis found.

“When constructed, the OMR will act as the backbone to developing areas in the north and west, ensuring that freight movements around the area are accommodated on high-quality built-for-purpose roads,” the 2021 analysis found.

Ah yes this is a road project for trucks primarily but lets soften the blow by saying it is for rail freight.

That year, the Victorian government lodged a $123.4 million funding submission to Canberra to begin to develop the Outer Metropolitan Ring, beginning with a standard-gauge rail connection from Beveridge to Werribee, connecting to a giant new freight terminal in Truganina.

This is not holding up the Truganina freight Terminal don’t be fooled. The government is dragging its heals and when the industry wanted to build a new terminal at Little River, it was blocked by the government.

The Victorian government argued that Canberra should bear the full cost of the project because the line would form part of the national rail network – traditionally a federal responsibility.

In other words, I want a road again which they would not fund and I will call it an inland rail project.

It sought to tie the enormous project to Inland Rail, a $31 billion, federally funded freight link between Melbourne and Brisbane, which is under construction.

Had the Commonwealth accepted Victoria’s submission, the Inland Rail line would have been extended deep into Melbourne’s industrial west, the correspondence reveals.

We already have a Standard Gauge Line into Melbourne’s west. What we should be doing is building an SG line to Melbourne’s EAST!

A new orbital rail line could then have been under construction today, snaking through some of the city’s fastest growing suburbs, including Mickleham, Diggers Rest, Aintree, Rockbank and Manor Lakes.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese views construction plans at the Beveridge intermodal precinct.CREDIT: AAP

But the Albanese government ultimately baulked, anxious to rein in rising costs on Inland Rail.

It chose in 2023 to build Melbourne’s Inland Rail terminal in Beveridge, 44 kilometres north of central Melbourne. The decision forced the Allan government to put its preferred terminal location, in Truganina, on ice indefinitely earlier this year.

Jacinta Allan was hoping for a free feed with Truganina but when the feds went to Beveridge she lost the opportunity and had to fund it with Victorian money.

Building the Truganina terminal would have cost up to $1.9 billion, but could have involved substantial private sector contributions, correspondence states.

Australian Rail Freight Alliance chief executive Reid Mather said the outcome was disappointing.

“The cheapest time to build is today. It won’t get any cheaper,” he said.

Mather said the Truganina terminal was more expensive to build than the Beveridge terminal, but better located. The federal government would not get full value out of the enormous investment in Inland Rail until freight trains could reach Truganina, and that required building the Outer Metropolitan Ring, he said.

The terminal in Beveridge was remote from most industrial precincts so would do little to reduce truck traffic on city freeways, he said.

“To be able to pack down a 1.8-kilometre train that would be double-stacked and get it back to do its 24-hour cycle to Brisbane, the most efficient way for that to occur is to unload it as close to the port as possible,” Mather said.

What is stopping the train being unloaded at the Port itself? TRhis is why the Port of Melbourne investment $200M in new rail access to the port. What a laugh.

“If we’re going to unload trains at Beveridge, the dilemma is … are you going to truck those containers in and cause more congestion?

Absolute rubbish. You will break the trains up and send the goods to the port directly. What would help is a terminal at Truganina to unload there for goods intended for the west.

We need a new super intermodal terminal at Dandenong area (south of Dandenong) that is where a lot of the containers are going to and from.

Rail Freight Alliance chief executive Reid Mather says Inland Rail needs a direct link to the Port of Melbourne via the western suburbs to fulfil its purpose. CREDIT: ALEX COPPEL

“None of these things are easy, but the only way you get double-stacked container trains in [to the Port of Melbourne] is to use the outer metro road corridor that has been gazetted for years.”

Again another lie

Melbourne’s west is the biggest freight and logistics precinct in Australia, moving about 12 per cent of the nation’s total freight, and 37 per cent of Victoria’s, according to Port of Melbourne figures.

Why no terminal at Tuganina? Pacific National tried to build a terminal at Little river and was blocked by the Allan Government.

Confidential correspondence argued Beveridge was an inferior option to Truganina because it was remote from Melbourne’s western suburban industrial heartland and its south-eastern population centres, it was a smaller site with less capacity to grow, and was more complex to build.

Victoria’s submission proved ill-timed, and too costly. Ballooning costs led the Albanese government to review Inland Rail the year after Victoria lobbied Canberra to inject billions more into the project.

The 2023 review acknowledged that the Port of Melbourne and the freight and logistics industry unanimously favoured Truganina over Beveridge, but concluded that building a rail line via the Outer Metropolitan Ring “is likely to be cost prohibitive and not needed for Inland Rail in the near or medium term”.

Truganina is the right place for a terminal and the area should not have been allowed to develop with a terminal. there is space for one there now and the government has not done a thing to get it moving. The rail line is close and could be connected.

The Outer Metropolitan Ring is a planned 100-kilometre road and rail line running in an arc around Melbourne’s northern and western periphery. The corridor was placed under a public acquisition overlay in 2010.

A completely stupid idea. The fright rail network is Melbourne currently is completely under-utilised.

The Victorian and Commonwealth governments jointly invested $20 million in a preliminary business case for the project in 2021-22.

The business case is being kept secret. A freedom-of-information request was rejected due to cabinet confidentiality, but The Age understands the mega-project was costed at about $31 billion in 2021.

The way Vicroria works it would be $60B now.

A spokesperson for federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the Albanese government remained supportive of building two terminals for Victoria, at Beveridge and Truganina.

This is exactly what should be happening and it should be happening now. What is stopping the terminal build at Truganina? We have been waiting 10 years for Port rail shuttles that have not yet arrived. Victoria is lots of talk and very little action on rail freight.

“Beveridge is being developed first because it can be delivered more quickly and is necessary in order to service Inland Rail’s double-stacked freight trains by 2027, while [Truganina] is anticipated to become the larger intermodal terminal over time,” the spokesperson said.

The Australian government has committed $1.72 billion towards the future development of the Outer Metropolitan Ring Rail and the Western Intermodal Freight Terminal in Truganina. Funding for the rail line is contingent on it being matched by Victoria.

We do not need the OMR there is capacity available now that is not used. It will not be necessary for a truck to drive between Beveridge and Truganina that if it needs to happen will happen on rail. In fact Port Rail shuttles will run between Truganina and the port and Beveridge and the Port. Inland Rail is deisgned to make trucks off the roads why do we need another multi-billion dollar truck sewer?

Asked on Monday about revelations in The Age that government planners predicted the first road component of the OMR was needed by 2031, acting Premier Jaclyn Symes said the road was “not a proposal that we’re actively considering”.

And rightly so. The federal government thankfully is in charge of the terminals that connect to Inland Rail we do not want the Victorian Government near it at all.

“But as is appropriate, preserving land for a future decision is an appropriate course of action,” she said.

An Allan government spokesperson said the ring was a crucial future transport corridor, but did not answer questions on when it was scheduled to be built, given the state’s failure to secure full federal funding for it.

The Age

2 thoughts on “How Victoria’s failed $6b pitch to Canberra put a new rail line in limbo

  1. If you think about inland Railk it is designed to shorten the time a train takes between Melbourne and Brisbane. How does the container or the freight get to the rail yard to head to Brisbane from Melbourne?

    Does Inland Rail expect to carry cargo from the Docks in Brisbane and Melbourne?

    An freight rail terminal should have already been built in Truganina why is because the Victorian Government is not wanting to pay of the build and this was all about the government getting free money to build a terminal at Truganina when the feds want Beveridge. I agree Truganina is a better choice and PN knew that too. What we don’t need is the rail line since there we know one exists and is not busy. It is possible to run trains from beverage to the Truganina terminal assuming it will use the existing track configuration or is the proposal to build a new main line in the west and have it connect to that?

    There is plenty of room on the RRL easement for a 3rd and 4th track the terminal could be connected from that line.

    The WIFT is an urgent project but remember they can’t even get Ballarat Intermodal running as the line is not even connected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *