The United States Air Force has rung the all-too-familiar warning bell that the Air Force’s planned Next-Generation Aerial Refueling System (NGAS) – a planned stealthy refueling tanker – may be unaffordable. One of the most important differences between a good aircraft and a bad aircraft is affordability (a good aircraft is the one that is built). No matter how good an aircraft may be, if it is too expensive, it may be canceled or prematurely terminated, like the A-12 Avenger II, B-2 Spirit, and F-22 Raptor.
Related Posts
Video: The KC-45 (A330 MRTT) – How Boeing Won A Contract First Given To Airbus
- Guest authors
- January 8, 2025
- 0
February 29th, 2008. It was the day that Northrop Grumman Corporation announced that it had been selected by the U.S. Air Force to provide the KC-45A aerial refueling tanker for the KC-135 tanker replacement program. Most notably, this jet would be based on the A330 commercial airframe, produced by EADS – which, these days, would be Airbus’ Defence and Space division.Unfortunately, the celebrations wouldn’t last long for Airbus and Northrop Grumman.Just days later, Boeing would launch a full-scale counteroffensive to convince the Air Force that it had selected the wrong aircraft. In the end, Boeing was successful in overturning the Northrop Grumman deal, having its 767-based tanker win instead. It’s been quite awhile since this whole ordeal took place – long before our website and YouTube channels existed. So we thought it would be interesting to take a look back for today’s video!