Implementation of the Rasht-Astara railway line, a key part of the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), will be signed off on April 1, 2026, according to Russian Energy Minister Sergey Tsivilyov. The corridor is seen as a keen way to build connectivity and move cargo from India to new markets in Central Asia, particularly Iran but also Russia.
The Rasht-Astara link between Iran and Azerbaijan is an important part of this. The line is to be 164 kilometres long and in 2023 was costed at 1.6 billion Euros with the cost being carried jointly by Moscow and Tehran. “The North-South corridor is not only an energy corridor, but also a transport one. The construction of the Rasht-Astara railway line is connected to it.
We have addressed virtually all previously outstanding issues, including land registration and obtaining benefits,” Tsivilyov said on the sidelines of an intergovernmental commission. “It is very complex, but we managed to resolve all the implementation issues. We can confidently say that as of April 1, we will begin the implementation phase of this large-scale infrastructure project,” he added.
Iran giving strong support to INSTC
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has committed to removing all obstacles hindering the development of the INSTC by the end of March. “Relations between Iran and Russia are robust, with numerous agreements being signed and actively implemented,” Pezeshkian said. “We aim to eliminate remaining barriers by the end of the (Iranian) year so that the railway route can be completed and become operational,” he added.
Iran’s role does bring challenges.
Iran is important to North South Corridor but there are some concerns its political stance both internationally and domestically is a problem. Led by a hard line Muslim Islamic establishment it has backed many of the rebellions in the Middle East and has incurred the strong disapproval of moderate Muslim states, the West and the United States, who maintains two battleship groups in the Indian Ocean in order to bomb Iran.
Domestically a worsening economy triggered huge demonstrations across the country which were brutally crushed in January leading to widespread concerns about the stability of the regime. “Tensions between Iran and the US, particularly Trump’s policy of reimposing ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran, undoubtedly increase the risks associated with using Iranian transit routes.
Furthermore destabilisation of the domestic political situation could lead to higher insurance costs for cargo transport,” Nargiza Umarova, Head of the Center for Strategic Connectivity at the Institute for Advanced International Studies, University of World Economy and Diplomacy, Uzbekistan told RailFreight.com.
Where is the money going to come from?
One other big problem for the Corridor is finance. Iran whilst it has oil has an economy which is severely sanctioned – the consequence of years of supporting Islamic rebels and attempting to have its own nuclear weapons. “Sanctions and their tightening remain a significant constraint. Last year, for example, Washington took steps to reinstate sanctions against Iran’s only ocean port, Chabahar, which is included in many interregional transport projects. Only India, which is investing in the port’s modernization, was granted a six-month deferral that expires in April 2026,” added Umarova.
Her view is INSTC does not harm Iran’s transit capacity, but rather contributes to its expansion — especially given the increased practical significance of the project for Russia. “Following international sanctions imposed on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, the country is reorienting its exports of raw materials towards the South Asian market. This trend has breathed new life into the INSTC,” she told RailFreight. “In 2024, for example, the volume of cargo transported along the eastern branch of this corridor, via direct rail links between Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Iran, nearly tripled compared to 2023, reaching 2 million tonnes”, Umarova added.
IMEC now more challenged
This is all adding to the difficulties facing IMEC the India-Middle East Corridor which India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced at the September 2023 G20 Summit in New Delhi amidst broad excitement which has now gone. Not only is the IMEC route too close to both the Houthi’s in the Red Sea and the Israel-Arab War but some feel Iran’s Revolutionary Guards – who control much of Iran’s logistic industry – have a vested interest in egging the conflicts on.
“If IMEC became the standard trade route, not only Iran but also the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps itself stood to lose. If the Bab el-Mandab (the entrance to the Red Sea and prime Houthi territory) remained too risky or expensive to transit, Iran hoped to profit as an alternative transit route,” said Michael Rubin director of policy analysis at the Middle East Forum and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in FirstPost.com. On top of this Saudi Arabia, the effective Middle East part of IMEC, is now changing its foreign policy and pivoting towards Pakistan and possibly Turkey in what some have dubbed “the Islamic Nato,” – something that would be difficult for India.